DealScore
Limited beta access

Know the True Cost Before You Buy

Are you paying too much? What hidden costs are you taking on? And what will this home really cost you after you move in?

DealScore analyzes 100+ property, market, neighbourhood and financial signals to uncover hidden risks, estimate whether the asking price makes sense, and identify potential costs that could impact you after closing.

Enter the property address and find out what you're really buying — before you make an offer.

Normally $29-$99 · 100 free reports available

Limited beta access. Free in exchange for your feedback.

DealScore is an informational tool, not legal or real estate brokerage advice. By using DealScore, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Know the price. Know the risks. Know the costs.

123 Sample Street, Toronto, ON M5V 1A1

Illustrative property — price not shown

Detached single-family

Built
1962
Beds
4
Baths
2.5
Lot
30×120ft
Safe Buy Score
72/ 100Caution
Block contributions/ 10
  • 1Technical Passport7
  • 2Market Value & Comparables7
  • 3Zoning & Future7
  • 4Environmental Risks7
  • 5Infrastructure9
  • 6Education9
  • 7Demographics7
  • 8Financial Risks5
  • 9Commercial Activity7
  • 10Home Energy & Carbon6
AI Executive Summary

This illustrative property scores 72/100. Key concerns in this mock-up: undeclared basement renovation (Block 1), MPAC AVM slightly below list (Block 2), a 38-storey rezoning application 120 m away (Block 3), flood-plain proximity 460 m from the TRCA regulated zone (Block 4), and rising 5-year fixed mortgage rates (Block 8) that may compress affordability at renewal. Positives: strong school catchment (Block 6) and 800 m to a planned Ontario Line station (Block 5).

Strong school catchmentFlood zone concernUndeclared basement renoPlanned Ontario Line 800 m

Neighbourhood

Property anchor + toggleable overlays. Click pins for details; use the layer chips above the map.

Legend:GoodAttentionConcern
Block 1

Technical Passport

Simulated MPAC record: 1,847 sqft. Two closed permits (roof, kitchen) plus an expired basement walkout permit (2022, no final inspection) — likely an unpermitted finish. Verify before offer. All MPAC-labelled values are simulated; MPAC licensing is pending.

Year built1962
Sqft (simulated)1,847
Permits (5 yr)3median: 1
Construction class6/10

Assessed value (5-year, simulated)

MPAC-style annual assessment — pending licensing

Sqft (simulated)

MPAC-style sqft vs comparable sales

Permits filed (last 5 yr)

  1. 2018-05-14
    Roof replacement
    Permit #18-092201 · CLOSED
  2. 2020-08-23
    Kitchen renovation
    Permit #20-114078 · CLOSED
  3. 2022-03-19
    Basement walkout
    Permit #22-118902 · EXPIRED (no final inspection)

Annual tax bill

Latest 5 years · CAD

33 checks

2 concern2 attention29 clean
Identity & Legal
Assessment Roll Number1901-234-567-890-0000 (simulated 19-digit Ontario format)
Property Code / Description301 — Single-family detached
Legal DescriptionPlan M-1234, Lot 56
Structure
Year Built / Effective Year Built1962 / 1962
Number of Storeys / Building Style2-Storey Detached · Full storeys: 2, Partial: 0
Structure Code2010 — Conventional 2-Storey
Total Above Grade Floor AreaMPAC: 1,847 sqft

Why this matters

Discrepancies between MPAC records and building permit history often indicate undisclosed renovations.

MPAC sim

Exterior Wall ConstructionBrick (front elevation) / Brick veneer (sides and rear)
Bedrooms4
Full / Half Bathrooms2 full / 1 half
Overall Quality / Condition RatingQuality class: 6/10 (Average to Above Average) · Condition: Average to Good

Why this matters

MPAC's combined quality and condition rating directly affects your assessed value and annual property tax bill.

MPAC sim

Basement & Foundation
Basement Total Area1,020 sqft
Basement Finished Area0 sqft — Unfinished (MPAC record)

Why this matters

Unpermitted finished basements may require costly retroactive permits or removal during sale.

MPAC sim + Toronto Building Permits (live)

Basement Finish Type / DescriptionGrade 0 — Unfinished (no interior finish on record)
Foundation TypeFull Basement — poured concrete
Systems
Heating Type / Fuel TypeForced air / Natural gas
Air ConditioningCentral (Yes)
Fireplaces1
Lot & SiteFreehold property fields
Frontage & Depth30 ft × 120 ft
Lot Size Area / Units~0.083 ac (3,600 sqft)
Garage & Other StructuresFreehold property fields
Garage Type & Garage SizeDetached / Built 1962 / 240 sqft / 1 space
Pool DetailsNone on record
Sheds, Decks, Porches & PatiosNone on record
Assessment & Tax
Current Value Assessment (CVA)$1,180,000
Assessment Phased-in Value2024: $1,180,000 · 2023: $1,120,000 · 2022: $1,050,000 · 2021: $920,000 · 2020: $850,000

Why this matters

MPAC phases in assessment changes over four years. The phased-in values determine your actual taxable assessment each year — a title transfer can trigger a reassessment to full CVA.

MPAC sim

Tax Class / Subclass CodeResidential (RT) — Standard residential class
Assessment History (5 yr)+38.8% over 5 years (matches GTA average)

Why this matters

MPAC can reassess immediately after a title transfer — expect a potential tax bump in your first full year of ownership.

MPAC sim

Property Tax ArrearsNone on record (roll lookup pending)
Last Valid Sale DateOctober 2019
Last Valid Sale Amount$1,180,000
Permits & Compliance
Building Permit History3 permits filed in the last 5 years
  • Permit #18-092201 · 2018-05-14 · Roof replacement · CLOSED
  • Permit #20-114078 · 2020-08-23 · Kitchen renovation · CLOSED
  • Permit #22-118902 · 2022-03-19 · Basement walkout · EXPIRED (no final inspection)

Why this matters

Open or expired permits transfer to the new owner.

City of Toronto Building Permits Open Data + MPAC sim

Discrepancy FlagMPAC basement = Unfinished (0 sqft), but 2022 walkout permit expired without final inspection — likely unpermitted basement finish

Why this matters

An unresolved permit discrepancy becomes your problem at closing. The cost to bring unpermitted work up to code typically ranges $15,000–$45,000.

DealScore (MPAC × Permits cross-reference)

Property Standards ViolationsNo active violations or orders (last inspection: March 2024)

Recommended action

Request building permit closure documentation and verify basement renovation legality. Estimated remediation: $15,000–$45,000 if unpermitted work must be addressed.

Block 2

Market Value & Comparables

MPAC — pending licensing (simulated values)

Simulated MPAC-driven view: AVM Estimated Market Value of $1.435M sits about $50k below the illustrative $1.485M anchor — a small negotiation lever. Twelve comparable sold properties within 1 km (the MPAC maximum) show a range of $1.365M–$1.610M with similarity weights up to 91%. All values MPAC-simulated; MPAC licensing is pending.

AVM (simulated)$1.435Masking: $1.485M
Comps in 1 km (24 mo)12 of max 12arm's-length sales

Comparable sold properties — sale price vs. above-grade sqft (simulated)

MPAC AVM Market Sales Report · MPAC pending licensing (simulated values)

All 12 comparable sold properties · sorted by distance

118 Sample St72%
Date: Nov 2024Dist: 0.15 kmPrice: $1,320,000Built: 1955Above-Gr: 1,750 sfLot: 3,150 sfStyle: 2-StoreyBsmt Fin: sfGarage: 1
204 Nearby Ave81%
Date: Oct 2024Dist: 0.28 kmPrice: $1,395,000Built: 1958Above-Gr: 1,820 sfLot: 3,360 sfStyle: 2-StoreyBsmt Fin: 200 sfGarage: 1
256 Heritage Way79%
Date: Dec 2024Dist: 0.35 kmPrice: $1,365,000Built: 1954Above-Gr: 1,770 sfLot: 3,250 sfStyle: 2-StoreyBsmt Fin: sfGarage: 0
67 Parallel Cres88%
Date: Aug 2024Dist: 0.41 kmPrice: $1,440,000Built: 1960Above-Gr: 1,880 sfLot: 3,600 sfStyle: 2-StoreyBsmt Fin: 400 sfGarage: 1
19 Landmark Crt84%
Date: Sep 2024Dist: 0.47 kmPrice: $1,415,000Built: 1957Above-Gr: 1,840 sfLot: 3,500 sfStyle: 2-StoreyBsmt Fin: 250 sfGarage: 1
312 Cross Blvd91%
Date: Jul 2024Dist: 0.55 kmPrice: $1,450,000Built: 1964Above-Gr: 1,900 sfLot: 3,800 sfStyle: 2-StoreyBsmt Fin: sfGarage: 1
29 Adjacent St76%
Date: Jun 2024Dist: 0.63 kmPrice: $1,460,000Built: 1967Above-Gr: 1,950 sfLot: 4,000 sfStyle: BungalowBsmt Fin: 600 sfGarage: 2
441 Nearby Rd69%
Date: May 2024Dist: 0.72 kmPrice: $1,510,000Built: 1970Above-Gr: 2,050 sfLot: 4,200 sfStyle: Split-LevelBsmt Fin: 300 sfGarage: 1
155 Comparable Ct65%
Date: Apr 2024Dist: 0.81 kmPrice: $1,540,000Built: 1973Above-Gr: 2,100 sfLot: 4,400 sfStyle: 2-StoreyBsmt Fin: 500 sfGarage: 2
77 Crossfield Dr61%
Date: Feb 2024Dist: 0.87 kmPrice: $1,560,000Built: 1972Above-Gr: 2,080 sfLot: 4,600 sfStyle: 2-StoreyBsmt Fin: 450 sfGarage: 2
83 Market Lane58%
Date: Mar 2024Dist: 0.94 kmPrice: $1,580,000Built: 1975Above-Gr: 2,200 sfLot: 5,000 sfStyle: 2-StoreyBsmt Fin: 800 sfGarage: 2
490 Westview Blvd52%
Date: Jan 2024Dist: 0.98 kmPrice: $1,610,000Built: 1977Above-Gr: 2,250 sfLot: 5,200 sfStyle: BungalowBsmt Fin: 700 sfGarage: 2

MPAC AVM Market Sales Report · pending licensing (simulated values) · all prices CAD

2 checks

1 attention1 clean
Automated Valuation (AVM)Estimated Market Value: $1,435,000 (simulated)
  • Valuation date: as of today (simulated)
  • AVM Confidence Score / Rating: Medium-High
  • Value Range: $1,380,000 – $1,490,000

AVM is a simulated MPAC-style estimate for demonstration. Real reports will run a licensed AVM once MPAC data is available.

Why this matters

An independent algorithmic estimate gives a second opinion on price. A gap between AVM and asking price is a negotiation lever if the AVM is lower, or a sign of a strong price if the AVM is higher.

MPAC — pending licensing (simulated values)

Comparable Sold Properties (12 of max 12)12 arm's-length sales within 1 km in the past 24 months — see table below

Why this matters

Sale prices of similar homes nearby are the most reliable benchmark for property value. Each comp includes MPAC's per-property similarity weight to show how closely it matches the subject.

MPAC — pending licensing (simulated values)

Recommended action

Use the simulated AVM range and comparables as one benchmark. Ask your realtor for a full CMA and your appraiser for a formal opinion before making an offer.

Non-scored · Informational

Legal due diligence — your lawyer's job

DealScore does not read land-registry records. Title checks, registered encumbrances, undischarged liens, easements, and power-of-sale filings all belong to your real-estate lawyer at closing. This panel is a checklist of what to ask them for — not an assessment of the property.

Ask for a title search

Your lawyer pulls the parcel register and confirms the seller is the registered owner, that the description matches the offer, and that no third party has a claim on the parcel.

Ask about encumbrances

Registered charges (mortgages), construction liens, tax liens, easements, and restrictive covenants all travel with title. Anything not discharged before closing becomes yours.

Ask for a status certificate (condo)

For condominium purchases, the status certificate reveals reserve-fund health, ongoing legal actions, special assessments in flight, and any registered lien against the unit.

Ask about power-of-sale

If the property was ever sold under power of sale, that history is on title. Your lawyer can flag it and explain what it means for the current transaction.

DealScore reports are informational — they are not a substitute for legal advice or a title search. Always work with a licensed Ontario real-estate lawyer.

Block 3

Zoning & Future

Property is zoned RD (Residential Detached) — single-family + secondary suite + home occupation permitted as-of-right. Three active development applications within 500 m: an 8-storey condo, a 4-unit townhouse, and a commercial conversion. Future view + parking impact likely.

Zoning codeRD
Active dev. apps3neighborhood: 1.2
Heritage statusNone
Future zoningMCR

Development applications nearby

500 m radius · Toronto Application Information Centre

  1. 2024-02-15
    8-storey condo · 119 Sample St
    120 m east · Status: under review
  2. 2025-06-08
    4-unit townhouse · 145 Sample St
    260 m north · Status: approved
  3. 2025-09-20
    Commercial conversion · 89 Sample Ave
    410 m west · Status: active

Permitted uses (RD)

Breakdown of zoning by-law permissions

5uses

8 checks

3 attention5 clean
Current ZoningRD (Detached Residential) — Toronto Zoning By-law

Permitted uses: single-family residential

Toronto Open Data · Zoning portal

Active Development Applications3 within 500m
  • 119 Sample St: 8-storey condo proposed (under review since 2024)
  • 145 Sample St: 4-unit townhouse (approved 2025)
  • 89 Sample Ave: Commercial conversion (active)

Why this matters

Large developments nearby can affect neighbourhood character, parking, and noise during construction. They can lift property values — or narrow your future buyer pool if the change is unwelcome.

Toronto Application Information Centre (open data)

Approved Neighbor Permits2 approved permits within 100m (minor renovations only)
Official Plan AmendmentsNo pending amendments affecting this property
Heritage DesignationNot designated heritage

Adjacent properties: also not designated

Toronto Heritage Register (open data)

Conservation Authority RestrictionsProperty is not within a TRCA-regulated area

Reflects Conservation Authority regulated AREAS only (development / interference / alteration permits). Title-registered easements are checked separately by your lawyer.

TRCA regulated-area maps

Transit-Oriented ZonesProperty is within 800m of planned Ontario Line station (Riverside-Leslieville)

Implication: potential rezoning to higher density within 5–10 years. Could increase value but also change neighborhood character.

Why this matters

Provincial policy can override local zoning to allow mid- or high-rise development near major transit stations. Being inside an MTSA may significantly change the neighbourhood within 5–10 years.

Provincial Policy Maps + Metrolinx

Future Zoning ChangesCity of Toronto considering Major Transit Station Area overlay

Public consultation phase (2025–2026)

Why this matters

If approved, an MTSA overlay could allow 6–11 storey buildings within 500m of the planned Ontario Line station, changing the streetscape and potentially affecting property values.

Toronto Open Data

Recommended action

Strong investment potential due to transit proximity. However, monitor MTSA overlay decision — could enable property to be redeveloped or sold to assembler at premium.

Block 4

Environmental Risks

Air quality is good (AQHI 2 — low risk). The property is 460 m from the TRCA regulatory flood plain — close enough to affect insurance premiums. Radon for the M5V FSA is below the Health Canada threshold. Property sits inside the Highway 401 noise corridor. No contaminated sites within 500 m; nearest remediated Ontario MoE site is 1.2 km away.

Air qualityAQHI 2
Flood zone460 mTRCA regulatory zone
Noise corridorNEF 28–30Hwy 401
Radon (FSA)78 Bq/m³HC limit: 200
Contaminated sites (500 m)0nearest: 1.2 km
Federal brownfields (2 km)0

Overall environmental risk

Composite of flood + air + radon + noise + contamination

62/ 100Moderate

Flood proximity is the main concern; everything else is at or below city baseline.

Distance to environmental risks

Metres · lower = closer (worse for floods/highways)

7 checks

2 attention5 clean
Flood Risk ZoneProperty is 460 m from Don River regulated flood plain
  • Outside floodway, within Flood Vulnerable Area
  • Insurance availability: standard (no flood-specific exclusions)

Why this matters

Climate change is expanding flood zones. A Flood Vulnerable Area designation means the property could be affected by extreme events — verify basement waterproofing and review insurance coverage.

TRCA regulated flood maps

Radon LevelPostal-code (FSA) average: 78 Bq/m³ (below Health Canada threshold of 200)

Why this matters

Radon is a colourless, odourless radioactive gas that accumulates in basements and is the second-leading cause of lung cancer in Canada. Health Canada recommends mitigation above 200 Bq/m³.

Health Canada · National radon survey

Air Quality IndexAnnual average AQHI: 2 (Low risk)

Nearest station: Toronto Downtown (1.8km)

ECCC · Environment and Climate Change Canada

Noise ContoursProperty within Highway 401 noise corridor (NEF 28–30)

Annoying but not actionable per Toronto bylaws

Why this matters

Sustained noise above NEF 25 is linked to sleep disruption and cardiovascular stress. Future buyers sensitive to noise may flag this, potentially narrowing your buyer pool at resale.

GTAA Pearson AOA + Ontario MTO highway network

Tree Protection BylawsNot designated a protected tree area

Adjacent properties: 2 protected trees within 30m

Toronto Private Tree By-law (open data)

Contaminated Sites Nearby0 sites within 500 m · 1 remediated site 1.2 km northwest (industrial redevelopment, closed 2019)

Why this matters

Even remediated sites can affect groundwater and re-sale sentiment. Buyer's lawyer should request an environmental status letter if any site is within 250 m.

Ontario Ministry of Environment — Contaminated Sites Registry

Federal Brownfields NearbyNo federal contaminated site within 2 km

Why this matters

Federal brownfields (former military, rail, or postal lands) can host legacy soil and groundwater contamination. Distance > 2 km makes cross-site migration extremely unlikely.

Treasury Board — Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory

Block 5

Infrastructure

Exceptional infrastructure — Walker's Paradise (87) with Excellent Transit (92) and 5 rapid stations within 1 km. Four major Metrolinx projects within 2 km will materially improve transit over the next 5 years.

Walk Score87
Transit Score92
Bike Score78
Green P lots ≤500m5avg rate $3.20/h

Walk Score

87/ 100Very Walkable

Transit

92/ 100Excellent

EV charging

62/ 100Moderate

Future transit projects (Metrolinx)

Within 2 km · expected completion

  1. 2025
    Finch West LRT — open
    Humber College ↔ Finch Station · 4.8 km
  2. 2030
    Eglinton Crosstown West Ext.
    Mount Dennis ↔ Renforth · 5.2 km
  3. 2031
    Ontario Line — Riverside/Leslieville
    800 m · daily ridership 388k forecast
  4. 2032
    Yonge North Subway Extension
    5 new stations Steeles → Richmond Hill · 12.4 km

8 checks

8 clean
Walk ScoreScore: 87/100 — Very Walkable
Transit ScoreScore: 92/100 — Excellent Transit
Time to Nearest StationClosest: Queen Station (TTC Line 1) — 8 min walk

GO Station (Union) — 14 min by transit

Google Places API + TTC GTFS

Schools, Hospitals, ShopsWithin 1km
  • 4 elementary schools
  • 2 high schools
  • 1 hospital (Toronto General, 1.4km)
  • 18 grocery stores
  • 47 restaurants

Google Places API

Future Transit ProjectsOntario Line station 800m (opening 2031)

Eglinton Crosstown extension under planning

Why this matters

Confirmed transit infrastructure within 1km has historically driven a 5–15% price premium in comparable Toronto corridors in the years before opening. The Ontario Line is fully funded and under construction.

Metrolinx capital projects

Parking Availability5 Green P lots within 500 m

Average rate: $3.20/hr peak

Green P Open Data (Toronto) + GTA municipal parking (Mississauga · Brampton · Markham · Vaughan)

EV Charging Stations6 public chargers within 1km
Infrastructure Investment Potential (proprietary)DealScore Score: 84/100 — High potential

Driven by Ontario Line proximity + density permits

DealScore Analysis

Block 6

Education

Strong catchment — Niagara Street Junior PS (Fraser 8.2/10, EQAO above Toronto average across all subjects). One French Immersion option within 1.2 km. Central Tech Secondary has IB program. Three private schools within 5 km.

Public catchmentNiagara St JPS
Fraser rating8.2city median: 6.8
French Immersion1 school1.2 km away
IB programCentral Tech1.7 km

Nearby schools — Fraser ratings

5 closest catchment schools · 0–10 scale

EQAO achievement — catchment school

% meeting provincial standard · all 6 subjects tested

8 checks

1 attention7 clean
School Catchment ZonesCatchment summary
  • Public elementary: Niagara Street Junior PS (Grade JK–6)
  • Public secondary: Central Tech Secondary (Grade 9–12)
  • Catholic: St. Mary Catholic Academy

Why this matters

Catchment boundaries are tied to civic address and can change — always verify with the school board at offer time, not just at listing.

TDSB + TCDSB

EQAO ScoresNiagara Street JPS: 84% at provincial standard (Grade 3 reading)

Above Toronto board average of 71%

EQAO · Grade 3/6/9 + OSSLT

Fraser Institute RankingsSchool rankings
  • Niagara Street JPS: 8.2/10 (top 15% in Ontario)
  • Central Tech Secondary: 7.1/10 (top 30%)

Fraser Institute · Report Card

French Immersion AvailabilityAvailable at Frankland PS (1.2 km away)

Currently 18-month waitlist

Why this matters

French Immersion waitlists in Toronto are often 12–24 months — families who require FI need to register well before they move, not after.

TDSB French Immersion

Private Schools3 private schools within 3km
  • Branksome Hall (girls)
  • Upper Canada College (boys)
  • Royal St. George's College (boys)

OurKids.net

Specialized ProgramsPrograms available nearby
  • Gifted program at Northlea EMS (1.8 km)
  • IB program at Central Tech Secondary (1.7 km)
  • Arts program at Cardinal Carter Academy

TDSB gifted / IB / arts

Boundary Changes (5 years)No changes to current catchment · No pending changes

Why this matters

Boundary changes can silently move a property into a lower-ranked school zone. Stable boundaries for five years is a meaningful positive signal.

TDSB + TCDSB boundary history

Before/After CareYMCA before/after care at Niagara Street JPS

Capacity: 60 students, currently 12 spots

TDSB before/after school care

Block 7

Demographics

High-income, young-professional census tract — median household income $108k (40% above city median), 64% aged 25–44, 71% with bachelor's+. Composite Major Crime Indicator rate is ~24% below city average; auto theft is the lone outlier.

Population12,840+8% in 5 yrs
Median income$108kcity median: $77k
Crime rate38 / 1000city avg: 50
Top languageEnglish82% at home

Population — 10 year trend

Census tract 0034.00 (Toronto Open Data)

Language at home

StatCan 2021 census tract data

14languages

Crime profile (3 yr)

Per-1000 residents · vs. Toronto average

Age distribution

StatCan 2021 census tract

36median age

7 checks

1 attention5 clean
Median Household IncomeCensus tract: $108,000/year

City median: $77,000/year (+40% above)

StatCan Census 2021 (CT-level)

Population Growth Trend+14.2% over 10 years (steady growth)
Crime StatisticsComposite Major Crime Indicator rate: 38 / 1000 residents (city avg: 50) — about 24% below city average
  • Assault, B&E, robbery: below city average
  • Auto theft: slightly above city average

Why this matters

Crime rates directly affect home insurance premiums. Note: auto theft above average — worth checking garage security before offer.

Toronto Police MCI + regional police (York · Peel · Halton · Durham)

Insurance Claims DensityPending integration (IBC)

Home insurance claims density by postal FSA is not yet wired in — IBC data licensing is in progress.

Insurance Bureau of Canada — pending integration

Rental Market DataVacancy rate: 1.8% (very tight)
  • Average 3-bdrm rent: $3,800/month
  • Investment yield potential: 4.2%

CMHC Rental Market Survey

Language DiversityEnglish: 82% | Mandarin: 4% | French: 3% | Cantonese: 3% | Other: 8%
Gentrification Index (proprietary)DealScore Score: 78/100 — Active gentrification

Property values rising faster than income

Why this matters

Property values rising faster than incomes means the neighbourhood is changing quickly. Near-term appreciation is likely, but neighbourhood character is also likely to shift.

DealScore Analysis

Block 8

Financial Risks

Posted 5-year fixed mortgage rates are up roughly 90 bps over 12 months and the OSFI qualifying rate sits around 7.84%. Live stress test below uses today's Bank of Canada series. Property tax arrears and insurer availability are flagged as pending integrations.

5-yr fixed (posted)5.84%12 mo ago: 4.94%
Prime rate6.95%
OSFI qualifying7.84%stress-test
12-mo trend+90 bpsflattening
Live OSFI stress test — enter your numbers

Mortgage affordability calculator

Your inputs are saved locally — only you can see them.

5-year fixed mortgage rate — 12-month trend

Bank of Canada posted average · quarterly snapshots

5 checks

3 attention1 clean
Current 5-year fixed mortgage ratePosted-average 5-year fixed: 5.84%

Up from 4.94% twelve months ago — payment on a $1,150,000 amortized mortgage is roughly $610/mo higher than a year ago.

Why this matters

The 5-year fixed is the benchmark insured buyers qualify and renew against. Higher posted rates pull qualifying rates up across the market.

Bank of Canada Valet · Series V80691335

Bank prime ratePrime: 6.95%

Variable-rate mortgages are typically priced at Prime minus 0.60-1.00%, putting most variables in the 5.95-6.35% range today.

Why this matters

Variable rates float with Prime — any further BoC hike lifts your payment within a month.

Bank of Canada Valet · Series V80691263

OSFI stress-test qualifying rateQualifying rate: 7.84%

Calculated as max(contract rate + 2%, 5.25%). Every new insured mortgage must qualify at this rate, not the rate you actually pay.

Why this matters

The stress test sets the affordability ceiling. At 7.84%, the qualifying payment on this property is roughly $1,400/mo higher than at the contract rate.

OSFI Guideline B-20 + Bank of Canada Valet

12-month mortgage rate trend5-year fixed: +90 bps over 12 months (4.94% → 5.84%)

Trend has flattened in the last quarter. Bond-market pricing implies stability into mid-2026.

Why this matters

A rising rate environment at time of purchase means your renewal may cost more than today. Locking in for a longer term can reduce this risk.

Bank of Canada Valet · 12-month series

Property tax arrears + insurance availabilityPending integrations

Property tax arrears need a municipal roll-number lookup; insurer availability needs a quote check at offer time.

Why this matters

Property tax arrears are a registered claim against the property that must be paid at closing — they don't disappear with the seller.

Municipal records + IBC — pending integration

Recommended action

Stress-test the carry cost at the OSFI qualifying rate, not the contract rate. Renewing in a higher-rate environment compresses payment headroom — build a 15-20% cushion into your monthly budget.

Block 9

Commercial Activity

High commercial vibrancy — 412 active business licenses in the FSA, 41% restaurants/cafes. Short-term rental density is moderate (1.4% of housing stock), trending down since the 2024 license tightening. No vacant-storefront cluster nearby.

Active businesses412FSA M5V density
Restaurants ≤500m18
Airbnb density1.4%city: 1.1%
Vacant storefrontsLow−12% YoY

Business mix in M5V

Top 6 license categories · Toronto Open Data

412licenses

Short-term rental density

% of FSA housing stock with active STR license

4 checks

2 attention2 clean
Local Business Density47 active businesses within 500m

Mix: 40% food/beverage, 25% retail, 20% services, 15% other

Toronto Business Licences (open data)

Short-Term Rental Density (FSA)1.4% of FSA housing stock registered as short-term rental (2026 YTD)
  • Trending down from 2.2% in 2020 following 2024 licensing tightening
  • Toronto STR bylaw restricts to primary residence only

Why this matters

High STR density can affect parking availability and neighbourhood character. Declining rates following regulatory tightening return units to the long-term rental supply — a positive direction.

Toronto STR Registry (open data)

Business Closure RateLast 12 months: 3 closures vs 7 openings

Net positive — healthy local economy

Google Places + Yelp Fusion

Future Retail Development119 Sample St development includes 4,200 sqft retail at grade

Could increase foot traffic and noise

Why this matters

New retail at grade can increase foot traffic, noise, and delivery activity. The impact depends heavily on the tenant — a grocery is generally positive; a bar or nightclub less so.

Toronto Application Information Centre (open data)

Block 10

Home Energy & Carbon

Annual energy rating, consumption breakdown, and retrofit recommendations — MPAC/Climative EnerGuide data, pending licensing

This 1962-built detached rates 185 GJ/yr — 35% above the Ontario median of 137 GJ/yr. Forced-air gas heating drives 65% of energy use (120 GJ); single-pane windows and original insulation compound losses. At 10.5 t CO₂e/yr — 91% above the provincial median — the carbon carrying cost rises with each $15/tonne federal increase. A full retrofit sequence (heat pump, air sealing, triple-pane windows, HPWH) cuts energy by 110 GJ/yr (−59%) and carbon by 8 t (−76%), bringing the home near net-zero operational carbon. Federal + Ontario incentives offset up to $21,600. All values MPAC/Climative EnerGuide simulated; licensing pending.

Energy rating185 GJ/yrON median: 137 GJ
Carbon emissions10.5 t CO₂eON median ≈ 5.5 t
After full retrofit75 GJ/yr−59% · 2.5 t CO₂e
Most efficientHigh energy use
This home: 185 GJ/yr(+35% vs. ON median)ON median: 137 GJ/yrAfter retrofit: 75 GJ/yr

1 GJ ≈ 2 BBQ propane tanks · 27 m³ natural gas · 278 kWh electricity · Powered by Climative + MPAC (simulated)

Annual energy use by end-use · 185 GJ/yr total
Space Heating65%(120 GJ)
Appliances & Other17%(31 GJ)
Water Heating14%(26 GJ)
Space Cooling4%(7 GJ)
Carbon Emissions
10.5t CO₂e/yr(+91% vs. ON median)
BestWorst
ON median: 5.5 t CO₂e/yr · After retrofit: 2.5 t CO₂e/yr
Tree Equivalency
~420
mature trees needed each year to absorb this home's annual carbon emissions
After full retrofit: ~107 trees (−75%)
Recommended retrofits · ranked by energy savings
Cold-Climate Heat Pump
Replaces gas furnace — moves heat rather than burning fuel. ≈3× more efficient than combustion.
53 GJ/yr
energy saved
4.2 t CO₂e
emissions/yr
Share of current energy use29%
Cost: $15,000–$25,000up to $10,000 back
Air Sealing + Attic Insulation
Patches envelope leaks, upgrades attic to R-60. Highest energy return per dollar spent.
28 GJ/yr
energy saved
1.7 t CO₂e
emissions/yr
Share of current energy use15%
Cost: $6,000–$12,000up to $5,600 back
Triple-Pane Windows × 15
Replaces single-pane units (U ≈ 1.0 → 0.15). Cuts window heat loss by 85%.
20 GJ/yr
energy saved
1.2 t CO₂e
emissions/yr
Share of current energy use11%
Cost: $22,000–$30,000up to $5,000 back
Heat-Pump Water Heater
Electric HPWH replaces aging gas storage tank — 2.5× more efficient, substantially lower GHG.
12 GJ/yr
energy saved
0.7 t CO₂e
emissions/yr
Share of current energy use6%
Cost: $3,000–$5,000up to $1,000 back
After all retrofits — projected result
Current
185
GJ/yr
10.5 t CO₂e
Total savings
113
GJ/yr
7.8 t CO₂e
After retrofit
75
GJ/yr
2.5 t CO₂e
Current: 185 GJ/yr100%
After full retrofit: 75 GJ/yr41%

To estimate retrofit impact: deduct each measure's GJ and CO₂e savings from current totals. Savings may overlap where measures share an end-use. MPAC Automated Home Energy Rating and Retrofit Report — pending licensing (simulated) · Powered by Climative.

Available incentives (simulated)
  • Canada Greener Homes Grantup to $5,600 for insulation, windows, and heat pump (federal)
  • Canada Greener Homes Loan0% interest loan up to $40,000 over 10 years (federal)
  • Enbridge Home Efficiency Rebateup to $5,000 for heat pump + insulation (Ontario)
  • OPA / IESO Energy Programsup to $5,000 for qualified heat pumps and smart controls
  • Check with your local electricity or natural gas provider for additional programs. Source: MPAC/Climative (simulated) · always verify eligibility directly.

10 checks

7 attention3 clean
Energy Profile
Estimated Energy Rating185 GJ/yr (MPAC/Climative EnerGuide simulated) — 35% above the Ontario median of 137 GJ/yr
  • Rating unit: GJ/year (Gigajoules) — 1 GJ ≈ 2 BBQ propane tanks, 27 m³ natural gas, or 278 kWh electricity
  • Ontario median home: 137 GJ/yr
  • Modern equivalent new build (1,847 sqft): ~60 GJ/yr

Why this matters

The MPAC energy rating measures whole-home annual consumption in GJ/yr, enabling apples-to-apples comparison regardless of fuel type. A rating above the Ontario median indicates an energy-intensive home and higher ongoing carrying costs as carbon pricing increases.

MPAC Automated Home Energy Rating and Retrofit Report — pending licensing (simulated values) · Powered by Climative

Energy Use BreakdownSpace Heating 65% · Appliances & Other 17% · Water Heating 14% · Space Cooling 4%
  • Space Heating: 65% (120 GJ/yr) — 1962-era forced-air gas, single-pane windows, under-insulated envelope
  • Appliances, Lights & Other: 17% (31 GJ/yr)
  • Water Heating: 14% (26 GJ/yr) — aging gas storage tank
  • Space Cooling: 4% (8 GJ/yr) — central AC
  • Annual estimated cost: ~$4,500–$6,000 at current natural gas + electricity rates

Why this matters

Space heating dominates pre-1980 homes. Targeting heating-first retrofits (heat pump + insulation) delivers the highest energy and carbon reduction per dollar invested.

MPAC Automated Home Energy Rating and Retrofit Report — pending licensing (simulated values) · Powered by Climative

Carbon Footprint / GHG Emissions10.5 tonnes CO₂e/year — ~420 mature trees needed annually to absorb these emissions
  • Ontario median home: ~5.5 t CO₂e/yr
  • This home: 10.5 t CO₂e/yr — 91% above median
  • Equivalent tree absorption: ~420 mature trees/year
  • Federal carbon pricing: ~$80/tonne today, rising to ~$170/tonne by 2030
  • Carbon cost impact at 2030 price: ~$1,785/year at current emissions

Why this matters

Federal carbon pricing rises ~$15/tonne annually through 2030, adding $840–$1,785/year to the carrying cost of a high-emitting home by decade's end.

MPAC Automated Home Energy Rating and Retrofit Report — pending licensing (simulated values) · Powered by Climative

Construction & Systems Efficiency
Insulation BaselineAttic: estimated R-12 (1962 original blown-in) · Walls: estimated R-7 (no exterior insulation) · Below-grade: R-4 (unfinished basement walls)

Why this matters

Current Ontario Building Code targets R-60 attic and R-24 walls for new construction. Under-insulation is the single largest driver of heating loss in pre-1980 homes.

MPAC EnerGuide — pending licensing (simulated values)

Window & Door Thermal Performance15 of 18 windows estimated single-pane (U-factor ~1.0); 2 exterior doors standard insulated steel

Why this matters

Single-pane windows lose 10x more heat than a well-insulated wall section. Replacement with triple-pane (U-factor ~0.15) would cut window heat loss by ~85%.

MPAC EnerGuide — pending licensing (simulated values)

HVAC Efficiency EstimatesHeating: forced-air natural gas furnace (estimated AFUE 78% — pre-2000 unit) · Cooling: central AC (estimated SEER 10) · DHW: gas storage tank (estimated EF 0.58)

Why this matters

High-efficiency replacements (AFUE 98% heat pump, SEER 18+ AC, heat-pump water heater) qualify for Canada Greener Homes and Enbridge incentive programs.

MPAC EnerGuide — pending licensing (simulated values)

Retrofit Recommendations & Savings
Recommended Retrofits — Ranked by Energy Impact
  • Cold-Climate Heat Pump: Save 53 GJ/yr · Reduce 4.2 t CO₂e/yr · Cost $15,000–$25,000 · Incentive up to $10,000
  • Air Sealing + Attic Insulation to R-60: Save 28 GJ/yr · Reduce 1.7 t CO₂e/yr · Cost $6,000–$12,000 · Incentive up to $5,600
  • Triple-Pane Windows × 15 (U: 1.0 → 0.15): Save 20 GJ/yr · Reduce 1.2 t CO₂e/yr · Cost $22,000–$30,000 · Incentive up to $5,000
  • Heat-Pump Water Heater (replaces gas tank): Save 12 GJ/yr · Reduce 0.7 t CO₂e/yr · Cost $3,000–$5,000 · Incentive up to $1,000

Why this matters

MPAC/Climative ranks retrofits by estimated energy savings. To estimate impact: deduct each retrofit's GJ and CO₂e savings from the current totals. Savings may overlap where retrofits target the same end-use.

MPAC Automated Home Energy Rating and Retrofit Report — pending licensing (simulated values) · Powered by Climative

Estimated Cost of UpgradesAll-in retrofit cost: $46,000–$72,000 · Available incentives: up to $21,600
  • Cold-climate heat pump (installed): $15,000–$25,000
  • Air sealing + attic insulation: $6,000–$12,000
  • Triple-pane windows × 15 (installed): $22,000–$30,000
  • Heat-pump water heater (installed): $3,000–$5,000
  • Canada Greener Homes Grant: up to $5,600
  • Canada Greener Homes Loan: 0% interest up to $40,000 over 10 years
  • Enbridge Home Efficiency Rebate: up to $5,000
  • OPA / IESO programs: up to $5,000

MPAC Automated Home Energy Rating and Retrofit Report — pending licensing (simulated values) · Powered by Climative

Estimated Energy Savings (all retrofits)185 GJ/yr → ~75 GJ/yr (−110 GJ/yr, −59%) · Saving ~$2,400–$3,600/year on energy bills

Why this matters

Retrofit payback (before incentives): 12–18 years. After incentives: 8–12 years. Rising carbon pricing accelerates payback by ~1–2 years per $15/tonne increase.

MPAC Automated Home Energy Rating and Retrofit Report — pending licensing (simulated values) · Powered by Climative

Carbon Footprint Reduction (all retrofits)10.5 t CO₂e/yr → ~2.5 t CO₂e/yr (−8.0 t, −76%) — near net-zero operational carbon

Why this matters

Low-carbon homes attract a growing buyer premium as carbon pricing rises. Retrofitted properties in comparable Toronto corridors have shown a 3–7% sale-price uplift versus non-retrofitted equivalents.

MPAC Automated Home Energy Rating and Retrofit Report — pending licensing (simulated values) · Powered by Climative

Recommended action

Budget for the recommended retrofit sequence. Priority 1: cold-climate heat pump ($15,000–$25,000, offset by up to $10,000 in incentives). Priority 2: air sealing + attic insulation ($6,000–$12,000). Both qualify for Canada Greener Homes and Enbridge programs.

Key takeaways

Strengths
  • Excellent transit (Walk 87, Transit 92) + planned Ontario Line 800 m away
  • Strong school catchment (Niagara Street JPS · Fraser 8.2 / 10)
  • Comparable-sale range supports the illustrative asking anchor
  • Low local crime relative to city average
Concerns
  • Undeclared basement renovation (simulated MPAC discrepancy)
  • MPAC AVM ($1.435M) sits below the illustrative asking anchor ($1.485M)
  • 38-storey rezoning 120 m away — future view + parking impact
  • 5-year fixed mortgage rate up 90 bps in 12 months
  • Flood plain 460 m from property
Action items
  • Request permit-closure documents for the basement finish
  • Use the simulated AVM range as a starting point for negotiation
  • Stress-test the mortgage at the 7.84% qualifying rate
  • Get a flood-specific insurance quote
  • Have your lawyer complete title, encumbrance, and status-certificate checks before closing (see the Legal due diligence panel)
ROI

Estimated risk reduction value

DealScore identified $35,000–$75,000 in potential risks and negotiation leverage on this property. Total report cost: $49 — ROI 714× to 1,530×.

Data sources

Three-part truth: the address on this page is fictional, so every value is illustrative — but DealScore's production platform runs on 44+ live data integrations listed below. MPAC-labelled blocks show simulated values while property-assessment licensing is finalised.

44+ live data sources in production
Live integrations — currently in production
  • Toronto Open Data CKAN — permits · zoning · dev applications · heritage · business licences · STR · Green P parking · trees
  • Toronto Municipal Licensing — Property Standards
  • Conservation Authorities — TRCA + CVC + Halton flood-zone GeoJSON
  • ECCC Geomet — Air Quality Health Index (AQHI)
  • Health Canada — indoor radon by postal FSA
  • Ontario Ministry of Environment — Contaminated Sites Registry
  • Treasury Board — Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory
  • GTAA Pearson AOA + Ontario MTO highway network — noise contours
  • Toronto Private Tree By-law (Chapter 813)
  • Toronto Police — Major Crime Indicators (ArcGIS)
  • York Regional Police · Peel Regional Police · Halton Regional Police · Durham Regional Police — 7 per-category feeds
  • StatCan Census 2021 — demographics + dwelling stats by CT
  • CMHC Rental Market Survey — vacancy + average rent by zone
  • Ontario Ministry of Education — School Information Finder (4,935 schools)
  • EQAO — Grade 3/6/9 + OSSLT achievement scores
  • Fraser Institute — school rankings (Report Card)
  • TDSB — French Immersion · boundary history · care · gifted/IB/arts
  • TCDSB — Catholic schools + programs
  • OurKids.net — private schools
  • Metrolinx — future capital projects (Ontario Line, Eglinton, etc.)
  • TTC GTFS — subway · streetcar · bus
  • Combined GTA GTFS — GO · MiWay · YRT · Brampton Transit · Durham Region Transit
  • GTA municipal parking — Mississauga · Brampton · Markham · Vaughan
  • Walk Score Professional API — walk + transit + bike
  • Google Places API — address autocomplete + amenities
  • Open Charge Map — EV charging stations
  • Yelp Fusion API — business quality + closures
  • Ontario Business Registry — corporate ownership
  • Bank of Canada Valet — 5-yr fixed · prime · OSFI-derived
Pending licensing
  • MPAC Propertyline — property + assessment + AVM (used across Block 1 + Block 2 in this sample as simulated values)
  • Insurance Bureau of Canada — insurance claims density (Block 7) + insurer availability (Block 8)
  • Municipal property-tax arrears — roll-number lookup (Block 8)

Plus: DealScore Analysis (proprietary methodology on top of the sources above)

Disclaimer

Three-part truth about this page.

  • The address is fictional. "123 Sample Street, Toronto, ON M5V 1A1" is not a real property, so every value shown on this page is illustrative and made up.
  • The integrations are real. DealScore's production platform runs 44+ live data sources — City of Toronto, Statistics Canada, five police services, Metrolinx, Walk Score, Google Places, Yelp Fusion, Open Charge Map, Bank of Canada Valet, TDSB, TCDSB, and others listed above.
  • MPAC is not yet licensed. Blocks labelled "MPAC — pending licensing (simulated values)" show the intended presentation of property-assessment data. No MPAC agreement is claimed or implied.

DealScore Inc. is a data analysis platform. We are NOT:

  • A real estate brokerage
  • A law firm
  • A financial advisor
  • A home inspection service

Reports do NOT constitute legal advice, financial advice, investment advice, or property valuation. Buyers must consult qualified professionals (lawyers, inspectors, accountants) before making property decisions. Ownership, title, and encumbrances are your lawyer's job at closing — see the Legal due diligence panel above.

Reports may include regional partner advertising, clearly labelled and matched by postal area (FSA). Advertising never affects the Safe Buy Score or any data shown in this report.

Safe Buy Score™ is a trademark of DealScore Inc. and represents a proprietary risk assessment methodology.

© 2026 DealScore Inc. | dealscore.ca | Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Ready for a real report on your property?

Instant delivery · No subscription · 30-day satisfaction guarantee